×
Home Current Archive Editorial board
News Contact
Orginal scientific papers

ANALYSIS OF THE ATTRACTIVENESS OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY STUDIES

By
Safet Brdarević ,
Safet Brdarević

University of Zenica, Zenica, Bosnia and Herzegovina

Dino Arnaut
Dino Arnaut
Contact Dino Arnaut

Faculty of Economics, University of Zenica, Zenica, Bosnia and Herzegovina

Abstract

In many countries, there is concern that enrolment in science and technology professions is decreasing and that more students need to be directed and interested in a career in science and technology. The reason why students do not choose science and technology studies is usually not about their abilities, but it is more related to student perceptions and attitudes about the attractiveness of subjects related to science and technology. Interest in science and technology studies is becoming an important issue given that more and more jobs in the field of science and technology remain empty, and technological trends create the need for new staff from science and technology disciplines every year. Numerous studies have shown that interest in science and technology has been declining with school years. Therefore, raising positive attitudes, motivation and interest in scientific and technological subjects becomes a key problem. This paperanalyses the number of enrolled students in the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina for the period from 2009 to 2017. From the analysis, we conclude that among the most popular studies are the those of social and
humanistic sciences with a strong increase in the popularity of health studies, while studies related to natural sciences and technology have not yet gained the desired popularity. The aim of this research is to raise awareness of the neglect of encouraging studies in the field of technical sciences. Therefore, this research represents an introduction for future research on the attractiveness of technical studies.

References

1.
Barmby P, Kind PM, Jones K. Examining changing Attitudes in secondary school science. Vol. 30. 2008. p. 1075–93.
2.
Beilock SL, Gunderson EA, Ramirez G, Levine SC. Female teachers’ math anxiety affects girls’ math achievement. In 2010.
3.
Vol. 107. p. 1860–3.
4.
Cavas P. Factors affecting the motivation of Turkish primary students for science learning. Vol. 22. 2011. p. 31–42.
5.
Davis HA. Conceptualizing the role and influence of student-teacher relationships on children’s social and cognitive development. Vol. 38. 2003. p. 207–34.
6.
Elwood J, Comber C. Gender differences in A level examinations: new complexities or old stereotypes? Vol. 6. 1996. p. 24–9.
7.
Frenzel AC, Goetz T, Ludtke O, Pekrun R, Sutton RE. Emotional transmission in the classroom: exploring the relationship between teacher and student enjoyment,Journal of Educational Psychology. Vol. 101. 2009. p. 705–16.
8.
Gottfried AE, Marcoulides GA, Gottfried AW, Oliver PH. A latent curve model of parental motivational practices and developmental decline in math and science academic intrinsic motivation. 2009.
9.
Vol. 101. p. 729–39.
10.
Hill C, Corbett C, Rose A. Why So Few? Women in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics. 2010.
11.
Kind P, Jones K, Barmby P. Developing attitudes towards science measures. Vol. 29. 2007. p. 871–93.
12.
Krapp A, Prenzel M. Research on interest in science: theories, methods, and findings. Vol. 33. 2011. p. 27–50.
13.
OECD PISA. Science Competencies for Tomorrows World. 2006.
14.
Osborne J, Simon S. Primaryscience: past and future directions. Vol. 27. 1996. p. 99–147.
15.
Osborne J, Simon S, Collins S. Attitudes towards science: a review of the literature and its implications. Vol. 25. 2003. p. 1049–79.
16.
Osborne J, Simon S, Tytler R. Attitudes towards science: an update. In 2009.
17.
Palmer D. Situational interest and the attitudes towards science of primary teacher education students. Vol. 26. 2004. p. 895–908.
18.
Pan Y, Gauvain M. The continuity of college students’ autonomous learning motivation and its predictors: a three-year longitudinal study. Vol. 22. 2012. p. 92–9.
19.
Potvin P, Hasni A. Analysis of the decline in interest towards school science and technology from grades 5 through 11. Vol. 23. 2014. p. 784–802.
20.
Reid N, Skryabina EA. Attitudes towards physics. Vol. 20. 2002. p. 67–81.
21.
Singh K, Granville M, Dika S. Mathematics and science achievement: effects of motivation, interest, and academic engagement. Vol. 95. 2002. p. 323–32.
22.
bilteni S. Federalni zavod za statistiku Bosne i Hercegovine. 2009.
23.
Trumper R. The need for change in elementary-school teacher training: the force concept as an example. Vol. 26. 1998. p. 7–25.
24.
Venturini P. Note de synthèse - Attitudes des élèves envers les sciences: le point des recherches. Vol. 149. 2004. p. 97–121.
25.
Wilkins JLM. Elementary school teachers’ attitudes toward differentsubjects. Vol. 45. 2010. p. 23–36.

Citation

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.