×
Home Current Archive Editorial board
News Contact
Conference paper

COMPARATIVE OF THE DISTRICT HEATING SYSTEM OF COUNTRIES IN TRANSITION

By
Maja Mrkić Bosančić ,
Maja Mrkić Bosančić

Ministry of Industry, Energy and Mining of Republic of Srpska, Banja Luka, Bosnia and Herzegovina

Petar Gvero ,
Petar Gvero

Faculty of mechanical engineering, University of Banja Luka, Banja Luka, Bosnia and Herzegovina

Jusuf Ibrulj ,
Jusuf Ibrulj

Vatroteh inžinjering d.o.o., Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina

Azrudin Husika ,
Azrudin Husika
Contact Azrudin Husika

Faculty of mehcanical engineering, University of Sarajevo, Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina

Srđan Vasković
Srđan Vasković

Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, University of East Sarajevo, Lukavica, Bosnia and Herzegovina

Abstract

During the second half of the last century in Europe, district heating systems (DHS) have been built intensively to supply cities and settlements with heat energy.
Taking into account that energy prices at that time were low, there was an economic justification for the construction of expensive infrastructural distribution systems. After the first oil shock of the seventies of the last century, there was a review of the consumption of petroleum products (mainly oil) as fuel in the heat sources of the DHS.
The European Union, as well as Bosnia and Herzegovina, in the heat energy sector has long-term goals that are aimed at increasing the DHS to 30% by 2030, or 50% by 2050, in that of the current DHS of 12%. The present (current) state of the district heating system in Bosnia and Herzegovina (Republic of Srpska and Federation BiH) is presented. The paper covers the technical, technological, supply, distribution, environmental, economic and market parameters of DHS in BiH. The institutional and legislative framework is presented in the previous paper, the comparison of parameters was made in relation to the cities of other countries in transition. The main conclusions are that in the cities of BiH (in the RS and FBiH) the small utilization of the district heating system is outdated, Investing in new ones requires significant investment funds, there are small movements in the application and introduction of renewable energy sources such as biomass, and in this connection, there is a small impact on CO2 emission reductions, large losses in heat distribution have been identified, and a market situation that is distinguished still high energy prices and pricing of heat service dominantlly is based on the surface of the space.

References

1.
Lukosevicius V, Werring L. Regulatory Implications of District Heating. 2011.
2.
Ministarstvo industrije energetike I rudarstva Republike Srpske, Vlada Republike Srpske. 2016.
3.
Federalni zavod za statistiku. 2016.
4.
RepublikeSrpske M, Srpske NSR. Strategija razvoja energetike Republike Srpske do 2030 god. 2012.
5.
Strateški plan i program razvoja energetskog sektora Federacije BiH. 2009.
6.
WEB strane privrednih društava.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
SEAP Akcioni plan energetski održivog razvoja opština koje su obuhvaćene analizom (Banja Luka.
18.
Economic Affairs M, Estonia C. Possibilities of efficiency in heating and cooling in Estonia. 2016.
19.
20.
21.
Lončar D, Riđan I. Medium term development prospects of cogeneration district heating systems in transitioncountry – Croatian case. Vol. 48. 2012. p. 32–9.
22.
Connoly D, Lund H, Mathiesen B, Werner S, Möller B, Persson U, et al. 2014.
23.
savings to decarbonise the EU energy system. Vol. 65. p. 475–89.
24.
Golušin M, Munitlak Ivanović O. Kyoto protocol implementation in Serbia as precognition of sustainable energetic andeconomic development. Vol. 39. 2011. p. 2800–7.

Citation

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.