×
Home Current Archive Editorial board
News Contact
Orginal scientific papers

EXTERNAL CONTEXT OF THE ORGANIZATION

By
Miroslav Drljača
Miroslav Drljača
Contact Miroslav Drljača

Zračna luka Zagreb d.o.o. , Zagreb , Croatia

Abstract

When talking about the revision of the ISO 9001:2015 standard, usually ten changes in comparison to the ISO 9001:2008 standard are listed. Some of the foreseen changes are of terminological character only. However, also some changes of essential nature are provided, such as: 1) structural changes respecting Annex SL, 2) understanding the organization and its
context, 3) total process orientation in organizational management and 4) introduction of a requirement for risk management. In this paper the author presents, in a systematic way, using scientific methods of cognition, the results of the research “external context of the organization” as a phenomenon. Understanding of this phenomenon requires philosophical approach to quality management and understanding pragmatic functionality of the organization. It is about the important requirement of
the revision of this standard because it positions the organization as an entity in the local, regional and global market

References

1.
E.U.R.O.S.T.A.T.
2.
3.
Drljača M. Sustav upravljanja kvalitetom i kvaliteta sustava upravljanja, Kvalitet i izvrsnost, FQCE-Fondacija za kulturu kvaliteta i izvrsnost. 1, Broj 7-8:16–9.
4.
Anić V i dr. Hrvatski enciklopedijski rječnik.
5.
Drljača M. Upravljanje rizicima, faktor održivog uspjeha. In: Zbornik radova 7 naučno-stručnog skupa s međunarodnim sudjelovanjem, Quality 2011, Mašinski fakultet Univerziteta u Zenici. p. 399–404.
6.
Centar za kvalitet Crne Gore i časopis Kvalitet. :33-39 110.
7.
8.
9.
10.

Citation

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.