×
Home Current Archive Editorial board
News Contact
Subject reviews

ANALYSIS OF THE FIRST EXPERIENCES IN THE IMPLEMENTATION OF FSCTM STANDARDIZATION IN THE ZENICA-DOBOJ CANTON

By
Kenan Zahirović ,
Kenan Zahirović
Contact Kenan Zahirović

JP "ŠPD ZDK" d.o.o. Zavidovići, Zavidovići, Bosnia and Herzegovina

Merisa Osmanović ,
Merisa Osmanović

JP "ŠPD ZDK" d.o.o. Zavidovići, Zavidovići, Bosnia and Herzegovina

Emir Đulić
Emir Đulić

Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, University of Zenica, Zenica, Bosnia and Herzegovina

Abstract

The paper presented the first experiences in the implementation of FSC standards in the area of Zenica-Doboj Canton. The number of corrective actions through all intervals of implementation of FSC forest standardization from 2013 to 2019 is shown. The largest number of noncompliance with the FSC standards referred to Principle 4 - Community relations and workers' rights.

References

1.
Martinić I, Lovrić M. Predavanja iz predmeta Šumarska politika i zakonodavstvo. Šumarski fakultet Sveučilišta u Zagrebu. 2010.
2.
Bakarić M, Martinić I, Landekić M, Pandur Z, Orlović A. Certifikacija šuma kao mehanizam unaprjeđenja gospodarenja šumskim resursima. Nova meh. šumar. 2015. p. 63–76.
3.
Panić L. Proces FSCTM CoC certifikacije praktična iskustva. 9th International Scientific Conference on Production Engineering Development and Modernization of Production; 2003. p. 201–6.
4.
Čomić D. Analiza potreba i mogućnosti FSC sertifikacije privatnih šuma u Republici Srpskoj, Šumarski fakultet Univerziteta u Banja Luci, str. 1 -30. 2011.
5.
Lazibat T, Baković T. Primjena međunarodnih normi u hrvatskoj šumarskoj i drvnoj industriji, Ekonomski fakultet Sveučilišta u Zagrebu, str. 1 -18. 2006.

Citation

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.