×
Home Current Archive Editorial board
News Contact
Conference paper

ACADEMIC STAFF EVALUATION – OBJECTIVE MODEL

By
Enes Dedić
Enes Dedić
Contact Enes Dedić

University of Bihać, Bihać, Bosnia and Herzegovina

Abstract

Academic staff evaluation poses a unique challenge in higher education system in Bosnia and Herzegovina. The established practice of selfrepresenting the absolute authority in public higher education institutions attenuated by the emergence of private higher education institutions where the employers sought for the results, expressed their own, as well as students’ demands. Encountered with new development in this domain, the members of academic community are facing an unknown and are feared that the application of various models would in fact deteriorate the image of their contribution, the value of their results and credits, and consequently recall or query the benefits at their disposal. This paper provides a detailed overview, expectations and demands for proper practice, and represents an objective model to be used.

References

1.
Mawoli MA, Abdullahi Y. B.: An Evaluation of Staff Motivation, Dissatisfaction and Job Performance in an Academic Setting.
2.
I.S.S.N. Vol. 1. 1839. p. 1–13.
3.
Bush T, Middlewood. D.: Leading and Managing People in Education. 2005.
4.
Mercer J. Appraising higher education faculty in the Middle East, Management in Education. Vol. 20. 2006. p. 17–26.
5.
Craft A. Continuing Professional Development: a practical guide for teachers and schools. 2000.
6.
Toch T, Rothman R. Rush to Judgment: Teacher Evaluation in Public Education. 2008.
7.
Buller JL. Best Practices in Faculty Evaluation: A Practical Guide for Academic Leaders. 2012.
8.
Türk K. Performance Management of Academic Staff and its Effectiveness to Teaching and Research – Based on the Example of Estonian Universities.
9.
Sciences ISSN. Vol. 20. 1736. p. 17–36.
10.
Türk K. Performance Appraisal in the University of Tartu. 1406. p. 143–50.

Citation

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.