×
Home Current Archive Editorial board
News Contact
Professional pappers

A RESEARCH INTO A CONNECTION BETWEEN ENGINEERING STUDENT MOTIVATION AND THE CLIL APPROACH

By
Aida Tarabar ,
Aida Tarabar
Contact Aida Tarabar

University of Zenica, Zenica, Bosnia and Herzegovina

Adisa Ahmetspahić
Adisa Ahmetspahić

University of Zenica, Zenica, Bosnia and Herzegovina

Abstract

The aim of this paper was to investigate the connection between student motivation and Content and Integrated Language Learning (CLIL) approach at the technically-oriented faculties of the University of Zenica. The past few decades have been marked with ongoing debates on what teaching approaches are most motivating for foreign language learners. It has been agreed upon that student-centered approaches are the most efficient ones. CLIL is one of them. Inherently, CLIL uses foreign language for teaching a particular content, in our case – the engineering one. For the purpose of the research, a questionnaire was conducted among the CLIL students, subsequent to their conference - CLIL 2017, which is the last stage of the CLIL approach to English language teaching at the aforementioned faculties. We hypothesized that the CLIL approach bolsters student
motivation for English language learning more than the ex-cathedra approach. The questionnaire proved the hypothesis true as the results indicated high level of motivation in students. In addition, students expressed great satisfaction with the CLIL in terms of its effect on their foreign language proficiency as well as the knowledge in the content matter
related to engineering. Also, students seem to be well aware of the fact that good knowledge of English language and good knowledge of engineering content create a solid basis for employment.

References

1.
Banegas D. Motivation and autonomy through CLIL. A collaborative undertaking. 2013.
2.
Covington M. The will to learn. 1998.
3.
Harmer J. The practice of English language teaching. 2002.
4.
Harmer J. How to teach English. 2008.
5.
Julkunen K. Situation-and Task-Specific Motivation in Foreign Language Learning. In 2001.
6.
Teaching, Center C. p. 29–37.
7.
Knapp K, Seidhofler B, Widdowson. Handbook of Foreign Language Communication and Learning. 2009.
8.
Lasagabaster D. English achievement and student motivation in CLIL and EFL settings. Vol. 5. 2011. p. 3–18.
9.
10.
McLeod S. Likert Scale | SimplyPsychology. 2008.
11.
12.
Navarro Gil N. Motivation and Content Language Integrated Learning: An impulse for Second Language Teaching. 2012.
13.
Papaya K. Focus on CLIL: A Qualitative Evaluation of Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL. In 2014.
14.
Richards J, Rodgers T. Approaches and methods in language teaching. 2014.
15.
Selfdeterminationtheoryorg.
16.
17.
Sylvén L, Thompson A. ResearchGate. 2015.
18.
Ushioda E. International Perspectives on Motivation: Language Learning and Professional Challenges. 2013.
19.
Westwood P. What Teachers Need to Know about Teaching Methods. 2008.
20.

Citation

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.