The main focus of this paper is to present the TQM practices of 593 companies in Bosnia and Herzegovina. In addition, our results confirm that there are statistically significant differences in TQM practices between firms in a highly competitive and less competitive environment, as well as between firms with and without ISO certificates. TQM practices do not differ between companies that belong to different groups that we constructed based on their age, location, export-orientation and the firm size. We contribute to the existing body of knowledge by identifying organizational contextual factors that might matter in designing more complex structural models.
Sharma U, Lawrence S, Lowe A. Institutional contradiction and management control innovation: A field study of total quality management practices in a privatized telecommunication company. Vol. 24. 2010. p. 251–64.
2.
Boulter L, Bendell T, Dahlgaard J. Total quality beyond North America: A comparative analysis of the performance of European Excellence Award winners. Vol. 33. 2013. p. 197–215.
3.
Prajogo DI, Sohal. A.S.: The relationship between organization strategy, total quality management (TQM), and organization performance––the mediating role of TQM. Vol. 168. 2006. p. 35–50.
4.
Pérez VF, Gutiérrez Gutiérrez L. External managerial networks, strategic flexibility and organisational learning: a comparative study among non-QM, ISO and TQM firms. Vol. 24. 2013. p. 3-4,.
5.
Lam SY, Lee VH, Ooi KB, Lin B. The relationship between TQM, learning orientation and market performance in service organisations: An empirical analysis. Vol. 22. 2011. p. 1277–97.
6.
Sila I. Examining the effects of contextual factors on TQM and performance through the lens of organizational theories: An empirical study. Vol. 25. 2007. p. 83–109.
7.
Dean JW, Bowen D. E.: Management theory and total quality: improving research and practice through theory development. Vol. 19. 1994. p. 392–418.
8.
Sitkin SB, Sutcliffe KM, Schroeder R. G.: Distinguishing control from learning in total quality management: a contingency perspective. Vol. 19. 1994. p. 537–64.
9.
Fonseca LM. From Quality Gurus and TQM to ISO 9001: 2015: a review of several quality paths. Vol. 9. 2015. p. 167–80.
10.
Chapman R, Al-Khawaldeh. K.: TQM and labour productivity in Jordanian industrial companies. Vol. 14. 2002. p. 248–62.
11.
Martínez-Costa M, Choi TY, Martínez JA, Martínez-Lorente A. R.: ISO 9000/1994, ISO 9001/2000 and TQM: The performance debate revisited. Vol. 27. 2009. p. 495–511.
12.
Terziovski M, Samson D, Dow D. The business value of quality management systems certification. Vol. 15. 1997. p. 1–18.
13.
McAdam R. Three leafed clovers?: TQM, organisational excellence and business improvement. Vol. 12. 2000. p. 314–20.
14.
Germain R, Spears N. Quality management and its relationship with organizational context and design. Vol. 16. 1999. p. 371–92.
15.
Jaafreh AB, Al-abedallat A. Z.: The effect of quality management practices on organizational performance in Jordan: An empirical study. Vol. 4. 2012. p. 93–109.
16.
Sabella A, Kashou R, Omran O. Quality management practices and their relationship to organizational performance. Vol. 34. 2014. p. 1487-.
17.
1505.
18.
Brah SA, Tee SS, Madhu Rao B. Relationship between TQM and performance of Singapore companies. Vol. 19. 2002. p. 356–79.
19.
Jayaram J, Ahire SL, Dreyfus P. Contingency relationships of firm size, TQM duration, unionization, and industry context on TQM implementation—A focus on total effects. Vol. 28.
20.
2010. p. 345–56.
21.
Das A, Handfield RB, Calantone RJ, Ghosh. S.: A contingent view of the quality management‐the impact of international competition on quality. Vol. 31. 2000. p. 649–90.
22.
Santos-Vijande ML, Álvarez-González L. I.: Innovativeness and Organizational Innovation in Total Quality Oriented Firms: The Moderating Role of Market Turbulence, Technovation. Vol. 27. 2007. p. 514-.
23.
24.
Jaworski BJ, Kohli A. K.: Market Orientation: Antecedents and Consequences. Vol. 57. 1993. p. 53–70.
25.
Bou-Llusar JC, Escrig-Tena AB, Roca-Puig V, Beltrán-Martín. I.: An empirical assessment of the EFQM Excellence Model: Evaluation as a TQM framework relative to the MBNQA Model. Vol. 27. 2009. p. 1–22.
Citation
Copyright
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
